And naturally, the vociferous few are making the most noise to persuade the Treasury to milk the taxpayer cash cow into funding yet another energy bailout.
Instead of imposing profit caps to curb price gouging particularly in supply areas affecting households powered by oil-fired central heating, the penniless (and clueless) Rachel from Accounts is looking to target funding to ‘those who need it most’.
So, what formula or criteria will the Government use to work out who falls into the ‘Those Who Need It Most’ bucket?
Somehow, I can’t see it setting up a registration scheme to identify households with oil-fired central heating. Creating a ginormous spreadsheet to record such data would be way too much work or be deemed far too complex for civil service monkeys to get their head round. Without means of corroborating applicant data, this would be a fraudster’s dream, with oil-fired central heating suddenly leap-frogging other conventional means of keeping homes warm.
I ask again. Who exactly are ‘those who need it most’ and what is the IT that they’re most in need of? A job, smoked kippers, bag of coal, silken underpants, a capybara?
Without further qualification of this statement, it will only serve to rile up the honest and upright tax/bill paying citizens that have always done the right thing into another populist froth because they will automatically jump to the conclusion that the IT equals more money for benefit claimants.
And with Treasury coffers already stripped to the bone then it stands to reason that if money has to be found for those needing it most, it's only going to come from one place - the taxpayer.
Some benefit claimants can surely not qualify as ‘those who need MONEY most’ because I’d bet my hat that many are ‘earning’ more from the Welfare State than some of us are in employment. Handing out cash on a blanket basis to anyone already getting a handout is not in my view providing targeted support with the limited means available to the Treasury.
Besides which, we’re heading towards summer. Most peeps (aside from the elderly or those with medical conditions) normally switch their heating off around the end of March so the impact of any price increases is not immediate other than at the petrol pump. In a few months’ time, this war might be old news and wholesale prices may have dipped back to lower levels so rather than jumping the gun, would it not be more prudent for the Government to adopt the NHS’s wait and see approach before scraping the bottom of the taxpayer barrel again?
Throwing out money the Treasury doesn’t have to the whinging throng is setting a dangerous precedent. It gives rise to expectations that the Government will always provide cash in any given crisis. It’s not really the way to build backbone or resilience in a population that wobbles like a hysterical jelly every time what is deemed a national disaster occurs.
People need to adapt to survive and sometimes this lesson has to be learnt the hard way; through struggle, self-sacrifice, squaring up to adversity and not cowering in a corner. Previous generations got through the repercussions of war or much worse and it wasn’t necessarily by receiving Government handouts.
Far better to equip those ‘who need it most’ with the necessary financial skills or mechanisms to help build strength of character so that when a bad situation crops up, they can remain calm and look for a solution rather than put their hands out.
Some benefit claimants can surely not qualify as ‘those who need MONEY most’ because I’d bet my hat that many are ‘earning’ more from the Welfare State than some of us are in employment. Handing out cash on a blanket basis to anyone already getting a handout is not in my view providing targeted support with the limited means available to the Treasury.
Besides which, we’re heading towards summer. Most peeps (aside from the elderly or those with medical conditions) normally switch their heating off around the end of March so the impact of any price increases is not immediate other than at the petrol pump. In a few months’ time, this war might be old news and wholesale prices may have dipped back to lower levels so rather than jumping the gun, would it not be more prudent for the Government to adopt the NHS’s wait and see approach before scraping the bottom of the taxpayer barrel again?
Throwing out money the Treasury doesn’t have to the whinging throng is setting a dangerous precedent. It gives rise to expectations that the Government will always provide cash in any given crisis. It’s not really the way to build backbone or resilience in a population that wobbles like a hysterical jelly every time what is deemed a national disaster occurs.
People need to adapt to survive and sometimes this lesson has to be learnt the hard way; through struggle, self-sacrifice, squaring up to adversity and not cowering in a corner. Previous generations got through the repercussions of war or much worse and it wasn’t necessarily by receiving Government handouts.
Far better to equip those ‘who need it most’ with the necessary financial skills or mechanisms to help build strength of character so that when a bad situation crops up, they can remain calm and look for a solution rather than put their hands out.
